Dedicated to the balanced discussion of global warming
BBC News – November 12, 2007
If you are a global warming skeptic (or if you deal with one regularly), you need to read this article on BBC. It covers a claimed top ten reasons that skeptics likely cite regarding global warming and then gives a short reason why the excuse is not valid.READ MORE
Danish National Space Center – March 2007
Once again, we find that the scientific understanding of our complicated climate is evolving. I repeat my call for more effort and concentration in this area of science since it appears that causality of climate change is not fully understood (comments by a famous politician not withstanding).
This study points out that there appears to be something missing between the causes of solar activity and other influences. When you see a claim such as "one can only wonder about the quality of the surface temperature record" then you start to question what is missing.
Yet over the past 20 years the solar cycle remains fully apparent in variations both of tropospheric air temperature and of ocean sub-surface water temperature.
Wired Blog Network – July 3, 2007
Excellent blog article and semi-civilized comments on cosmic rays and climate change. As you may know, many people think that cosmic rays are the root of the current trend in global warming. I think the jury is still out on this subject, the arguments for and against all seem a little vague to me.
This blog entry concerns a paper that has just been released called “Cosmic Rays and Global Warming” that will be presented at the 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference, held in Merida Mexico from July 3 – July 11, 2007 (sounds like a happening event – how do I get an invitation). The paper refutes many of the theories about the creation of clouds by cosmic rays and proposes that the effect does not occur.READ MORE
Financial Post – June 20, 2007
As those who read this site regularly know, I am firm believer in more research in the sciences of the global climate. It is important to understand, though, that scientists are people and generally have a position to defend or promote.
This particular study is interesting in that it re-confirms other studies that show an approximate 11 year cycle of climate change. This cycle is similar to the solar sunspot cycle however this does not mean that there is a causality here or is this simply a correlation. The author then adds to the argument by referencing another popular theory of cosmic radiation.READ MORE
Danish National Space Center
I usually write about articles that appear on the web but I am going to vary from that in this instance to talk about a site. The Danish National Space Center, which appears to have some relationship with the Technical University of Denmark, has several pages dedicated to the theories of cosmic rays and their influence on clouds on planet Earth. I tend to be a little skeptical about this line of reasoning but have now read enough about it to think that there may be some level of influence in this area.READ MORE
Friends of Science
There is no date on this site so I can’t reference when this was written. This is great little article in Question / Answer format (or in this case Myth / Fact). I have heard many of these statements before but it is good to read them on one site for evaluation. The Friends of Science site is fairly critical of the concept of global warming and in some cases I think their answers and articles could be slightly more balanced. Definitely an article worth spending some time on.
I have included all of the Myth statements below but have intentionally edited for brevity the Fact statement. Click through to get the whole article.READ MORE
Townhall.com – February 26, 2007
This is a commentary article about Al Gore, his recent accolades for “An Inconvenient Truth”, and some of the background science of global climate change. It is a very good read and I encourage my readers to click through to the source article (especially since the title is quite close to the URL of my blog).
It is interesting that the author tries to draw a correlation between the Academy Awards that Mr. Gore received and the timing of the IPCC report. I don’t think that this is anything but coincidence and all of my research indicates that the two are not tied together. We know that the Academy Awards are always held the same time of the year and it appears that the IPCC was always trying to put their release out at that time of the year. It does not appear that Mr. Gore’s very well made documentary had anything to do with it.READ MORE
This is a great article. The article discusses other potential causes of global warming than human action. It also takes a fairly cynical look at the politics of the money involved. If you have an open mind on global warming issues, this article is well worth your time.
Beyond the natural carbon cycle and greenhouse warming, there are some other serious causal explanations for global warming. Among the suspects are, of all things, the sun and its fellow stars.
Canada Free Press – March 3, 2007
This is an interesting article that is a little difficult to read in its original form. I hesitate to do this, but I feel compelled to insert the entire article here in this forum. I want to stress that I do not own the copyright to the following information – the copyright belongs to the original site and author as they have advertised on their site. I will only do this in rare situations where readability is more of an issue.
Senator Inhofe has made available his CPAC speech notes and PowerPoint presentation to the public. The science section notes below are only a sampling of the new developments since January 2007 refuting the media engineered ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming.]SENATOR JAMES INHOFE (R-Okla.)
Ranking Member Environment & Public Works Committee
MARCH 3, 2007 POWERPOINT SPEECH
TO CPAC IN WASHINGTON, DC