Dedicated to the balanced discussion of global warming
Townhall.com – February 26, 2007
This is a commentary article about Al Gore, his recent accolades for “An Inconvenient Truth”, and some of the background science of global climate change. It is a very good read and I encourage my readers to click through to the source article (especially since the title is quite close to the URL of my blog).
It is interesting that the author tries to draw a correlation between the Academy Awards that Mr. Gore received and the timing of the IPCC report. I don’t think that this is anything but coincidence and all of my research indicates that the two are not tied together. We know that the Academy Awards are always held the same time of the year and it appears that the IPCC was always trying to put their release out at that time of the year. It does not appear that Mr. Gore’s very well made documentary had anything to do with it.READ MORE
This is a great article. The article discusses other potential causes of global warming than human action. It also takes a fairly cynical look at the politics of the money involved. If you have an open mind on global warming issues, this article is well worth your time.
Beyond the natural carbon cycle and greenhouse warming, there are some other serious causal explanations for global warming. Among the suspects are, of all things, the sun and its fellow stars.
Newsweek – March 12, 2007 issue
An interesting discussion on the concept of trading emissions between governments and companies so that the world can make its goals of reducing CO2 emissions. This is a great read if you believe that humans can change the climate by reducing CO2 output.
Al Gore: A responsible approach to solving this crisis would be to authorize the trading
of emissions … globally.
the value of carbon credits in circulation, now about $28 billion, will climb to $40 billion by 2010
The notion that emissions trading is going to make a significant dent in global warming is deeply flawed
…allowing polluters in the developed world to shift the burden of making cuts onto factories in the developing world
JunkScience.com – April 21, 2006
This is a very long article that has quite a few good points in it. The article is a series of questions and answers on the subject. The author’s goals were to try and put some simple facts behind many of the myths and rumors regarding weather and the things that influence the weather.
This article should be standard reading for anyone that is interested in the details behind global warming.
Only the structure constraining internal-external convection will function as an effective greenhouse. Greenhouse gases categorically do not inhibit convective activity and so are not like a physical greenhouse.
NewScientist.com news service – February 17, 2007
This article deals with the removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) by sequestering it underground. It is a fairly brief article without a lot of details on how this could be done, its costs, nor are the side effects adequately explored.
On 10 February, an amendment to international law came into force that allows the greenhouse gas to be buried beneath the sea floor. At the same time, a new study counters one of the main fears over carbon burial – that the gas will simply leak out again, to boost future global warming.
Union of Concerned Scientists – June 28, 2006
This article describes several cases of the earth getting warmer and puts the blame on the human element. While there is little solid proof within this article, one most be curious that this is more than a coincidence.
Astonishingly, every single year since 1992 is in the current list of the 20 warmest years on record.
By matching the observed and modeled patterns, scientists can now positively identify the “human fingerprints” associated with the changes. The fingerprints that humans have left on Earth’s climate are turning up in a diverse range of records and can be seen in the ocean, in the atmosphere, and at the surface.
Union of Concerned Scientists – February 16, 2006
This article does a very good job of describing the role that forests play in the carbon cycle. The article describes the US forests and their role and current standing as carbon sinks. It makes a fairly strong argument of using increased forestation to reduce the threat of fossil fuel burning. The article also points out that in many parts of the world there is an effort in place to reduce forest size so that the land may be used for other purposes.READ MORE
Wikipedia is always a good source of information on technical items needing a simple explanation. In this article we learn about the carbon cycle and its potential influences on the climate.
The cycle is usually thought of as four major reservoirs of carbon interconnected by pathways of exchange. The reservoirs are the atmosphere, the terrestrial biosphere (which usually includes freshwater systems and non-living organic material, such as soil carbon), the oceans (which includes dissolved inorganic carbon and living and non-living marine biota), and the sediments (which includes fossil fuels). The annual movements of carbon, the carbon exchanges between reservoirs, occur because of various chemical, physical, geological, and biological processes. The ocean contains the largest active pool of carbon near the surface of the Earth, but the deep ocean part of this pool does not rapidly exchange with the atmosphere.