Comments on: Is it too cold outside to have global warming? http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/ Dedicated to the balanced discussion of global warming Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:02:31 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: George http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-15990 George Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:17:51 +0000 http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/#comment-15990 I don't understand why I hear nothing in media about the earth's magnetic poles shifting and it being the cause of these extreme weather patterns we have seen over these years. I do understand that Global Warming can be a billion dollar industry for Al Gore. But what about all the opposite affects that have and are taking place. Extreme weathers in their opposite climates. Since when has it ever snowed or hailed ice rain in Iraq and Mexico. And the many other tropical places. Tropical fish are being seen in the northern waters. Mammals are moving directions in to other areas. Are they being warmed out of their environment or following their inner survival senses. Either way.. For about 8 years I have followed the prophecies and forecasts of Her Holiness Hehpsehboah A. She has the longest track record of total accuracy. She speaks about the wobbling of the earth due to the unbalancing through sucking out oil, and the vibration from bombing underground and in war. she says the planet goes through this natural cycle but according to the actions of mankind, this transaction will be smooth or more drastically harsh. It makes sense to me, Check in to it. I don’t understand why I hear nothing in media about the earth’s magnetic poles shifting and it being the cause of these extreme weather patterns we have seen over these years. I do understand that Global Warming can be a billion dollar industry for Al Gore. But what about all the opposite affects that have and are taking place. Extreme weathers in their opposite climates. Since when has it ever snowed or hailed ice rain in Iraq and Mexico. And the many other tropical places. Tropical fish are being seen in the northern waters. Mammals are moving directions in to other areas. Are they being warmed out of their environment or following their inner survival senses. Either way.. For about 8 years I have followed the prophecies and forecasts of Her Holiness Hehpsehboah A. She has the longest track record of total accuracy. She speaks about the wobbling of the earth due to the unbalancing through sucking out oil, and the vibration from bombing underground and in war. she says the planet goes through this natural cycle but according to the actions of mankind, this transaction will be smooth or more drastically harsh. It makes sense to me, Check in to it.

]]> By: tim maguire http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-15040 tim maguire Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:38:47 +0000 http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/#comment-15040 I'm sure the Real Climate folks will say everything is according to plan. No matter what that everything might be. It's become a joke, one I repeat occasionally, that the difference between climate and weather is this: if it is unusually warm, that is climate. If it is unusually cold, that is weather. 5-10 years is far too short a period of time to make the jump from weather to climate (in fact, that they would even say such a thing suggests that the difference is arbitrary nomenclature and, therefore, not relevant to the AGW discussion), but if that is their standard, then the folks at NASA are one or two years away from declaring a cooling trend. I’m sure the Real Climate folks will say everything is according to plan. No matter what that everything might be.

It’s become a joke, one I repeat occasionally, that the difference between climate and weather is this: if it is unusually warm, that is climate. If it is unusually cold, that is weather. 5-10 years is far too short a period of time to make the jump from weather to climate (in fact, that they would even say such a thing suggests that the difference is arbitrary nomenclature and, therefore, not relevant to the AGW discussion), but if that is their standard, then the folks at NASA are one or two years away from declaring a cooling trend.

]]> By: admin http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-14959 admin Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:19:04 +0000 http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/#comment-14959 Actually, the folks at RealClimate say that this is all according to plan. I don't understand their logic but that is what they say. Actually, the folks at RealClimate say that this is all according to plan. I don’t understand their logic but that is what they say.

]]> By: Kirk http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-14943 Kirk Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:09:01 +0000 http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2009/01/14/is-it-too-cold-outside-to-have-global-warming/#comment-14943 Now that we have cooling for more than 10 years from the peak (which was due to oceans - i.e., nature), with the last few years colder than the prior year (due to oceans and lack of sunspots – i.e., nature), when do we conclude that we are in a cooling cycle? If not, when do we declare that we were not in a warming cycle or at least in a very gradual, gentle warming cycle? When do we declare that we do not have to react to hysterical environmentalists and politicians and do not have to take draconian measures to solve a non-problem. How much colder do we have to get before we can get the man-made global warming apologists / hysterics to conclude that (1) CO2 is not a factor – maybe a lagging indicator, but not a leading indicator, (2) man is not a major contributor – pretty arrogant to think that we are more powerful than nature, and (3) it is nature (sun, oceans, earth’s rotation, natural events) that warms and cools the planet, just like it has done for billions of years? When will we see new models to show that, even though they could not predict the cooling, whatever warming occurs in the next hundred years will be insignificant, since the latest cooling has wiped out more than 20 years of warming while CO2 was ever-increasing? Now that we have cooling for more than 10 years from the peak (which was due to oceans – i.e., nature), with the last few years colder than the prior year (due to oceans and lack of sunspots – i.e., nature), when do we conclude that we are in a cooling cycle? If not, when do we declare that we were not in a warming cycle or at least in a very gradual, gentle warming cycle? When do we declare that we do not have to react to hysterical environmentalists and politicians and do not have to take draconian measures to solve a non-problem.

How much colder do we have to get before we can get the man-made global warming apologists / hysterics to conclude that (1) CO2 is not a factor – maybe a lagging indicator, but not a leading indicator, (2) man is not a major contributor – pretty arrogant to think that we are more powerful than nature, and (3) it is nature (sun, oceans, earth’s rotation, natural events) that warms and cools the planet, just like it has done for billions of years?

When will we see new models to show that, even though they could not predict the cooling, whatever warming occurs in the next hundred years will be insignificant, since the latest cooling has wiped out more than 20 years of warming while CO2 was ever-increasing?

]]>