Dedicated to the balanced discussion of global warming
carbon offset / trading greenhouse kyoto climate model Inconvenient Truth bio fuel ipcc Glacier

Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas

KUSI

John Coleman spoke before the San Diego Chamber of Commerce on the subject of global warming.  Mr. Coleman is not your typical weatherman!  Some say he is the father of the weatherman on TV (not likely) but at the very least he is one one of the most successful.  A full profile is available for him on Wikipedia but among his many accomplishments, he was the first weatherman on the national morning talk shows (remember David Hartman?) and also founded The Weather Channel.

Mr. Coleman is pretty adamant that the current global warming trend (which many question actually exists) is most likely natural in origin and has little to do with the influences of man.

There is no significant man made global warming. There has not been any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always changed. But mankinds activities have not overwhelmed or significantly modified the natural forces.


Worldwide there was a significant natural warming trend in the 1980s and 1990s as a Solar cycle peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares. That ended in 1998 and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and the global temperatures have gone into decline. Earth has cooled for almost ten straight years.


Charles Keeling, another researcher at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute, set up a system to make continuous CO2 measurements. His graph of these increases has now become known as the Keeling Curve. When Charles Keeling died in 2005, his son Ralph, also at Scripps, took over the measurements. Here is what the Keeling curve shows: an increase in CO2 from 315 parts per million in 1958 to 385 parts per million today, an increase of 70 parts per million or about 20 percent.


Numerous independent research projects have been done about the greenhouse impact from increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. These studies have proven to my total satisfaction that CO2 is not creating a major greenhouse effect and is not causing an increase in temperatures.


And, it has lead to the folly of ethanol, which is also partly behind the fuel price increases; that and our restricted oil policy. The ethanol folly is also creating a food crisis throughout the world it is behind the food price rises for all the grains, for cereals, bread, everything that relies on corn or soy or wheat, including animals that are fed corn, most processed foods that use corn oil or soybean oil or corn syrup. Food shortages or high costs have led to food riots in some third world countries and made the cost of eating out or at home budget busting for many.

You can read his entire speech here.  It is a very convincing read so I suggest you click through and read it.

Did you know that you can have these articles emailed to you? Click on the Subscribe to email link in the upper right corner, fill out the details, and you are set. No one will see your email address and you won’t get more spam by doing this.

Similar articles that you may enjoy:

3 Responses to “Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas”

  1. Is there any agreemnt on what constitutes a climate expert? A weatherman may qualify, but then again, maybe not. In the meantime, I have heard warming skeptics say that there only appears to be a consensus if you include many scientists who are not climate experts and that the more narrowly you define the field, the more the consensus disappears. I have heard warming believers say the opposite–that the consensus gets stronger as you weed out non-experts.

    But I don’t know who the experts are.

  2. Tim – that is a good question. I think a non-expert is anyone that doesn’t agree with your viewpoint!

    A weatherman of 30+ years that has worked for such pre-eminent stations as John at least has the credentials to comment on the science even if he doesn’t have the education or desire to perform the actual analysis or do the research. By this standard, he is expert enough for me to consider what he has to say and I think other readers on this site.

  3. In the 1950s grade Z doomsday fiction movies dealt with “the end is near” subjects, like AGW. In those days nuclear accidents and consequent leathal radiation and/or concequences of nuclear war were to end the human race.
    Is today’s hyteria is the natural outgrowth of the 50s jitters and worries? Do human have a quasi-masochistic need for the ultimate demise?
    – C –