Comments on: John Stossel: Video: Give Me A Break – Global Warming http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/10/23/john-stossel-video-give-me-a-break-global-warming/ Dedicated to the balanced discussion of global warming Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:53:03 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Joe Winkelmann http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/10/23/john-stossel-video-give-me-a-break-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2190 Joe Winkelmann Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:09:41 +0000 http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/10/23/john-stossel-video-give-me-a-break-global-warming/#comment-2190 In the 50's it was Global Cooling! In the 50’s it was Global Cooling!

]]> By: Sandi http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/10/23/john-stossel-video-give-me-a-break-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2182 Sandi Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:16:19 +0000 http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/10/23/john-stossel-video-give-me-a-break-global-warming/#comment-2182 10 years ago in college, I did a report on Global Warming and how it could be a natural cycle of this planet. I used common known facts such as the Ice Ages and their subsequent warming periods to support my theory. Not to mention the fact that historical temperature have only been documented for the past hundred years. I am not a scientist, but am a semi-intelligent person who does not fall prey to the political hype. I do not have the access to all the data that the scientists do, but twenty years ago, I did have access to a report of what makes up smog in California. And carbon dioxide was the third highest contributor, not the highest as has been published. It was just the only one that man has the ability to manage somewhat. This whole global warming debate sounds a lot like past debates such as 'The sun revolves around the Earth" or the 'Earth is Flat". Only actual full disclosure and time will tell which side is correct. But the fact that one side is not even willing to discuss another possibility is pretty telling. The 'deniers' are not denying the possiblity of Global Warming or the possibility that man maybe increasing the rate, but rather the position that global warming is here due to Man and that our current path will destroy the world. And I would love to know who the well funded machine is so that I can get in on the money! 10 years ago in college, I did a report on Global Warming and how it could be a natural cycle of this planet. I used common known facts such as the Ice Ages and their subsequent warming periods to support my theory. Not to mention the fact that historical temperature have only been documented for the past hundred years. I am not a scientist, but am a semi-intelligent person who does not fall prey to the political hype. I do not have the access to all the data that the scientists do, but twenty years ago, I did have access to a report of what makes up smog in California. And carbon dioxide was the third highest contributor, not the highest as has been published. It was just the only one that man has the ability to manage somewhat.

This whole global warming debate sounds a lot like past debates such as ‘The sun revolves around the Earth” or the ‘Earth is Flat”. Only actual full disclosure and time will tell which side is correct. But the fact that one side is not even willing to discuss another possibility is pretty telling. The ‘deniers’ are not denying the possiblity of Global Warming or the possibility that man maybe increasing the rate, but rather the position that global warming is here due to Man and that our current path will destroy the world. And I would love to know who the well funded machine is so that I can get in on the money!

]]>