<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cold Facts on Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the balanced discussion of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:02:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Mistake #1:  &quot;most sources place it between 90 and 95%&quot;:  

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/04/water-vapour-feedback-or-forcing/

And other calculations show that water vapor plus clouds is 66% to 85%.  

Mistake #2:  Assuming that there isn&#039;t a feedback between GHG forcing and water vapor levels.  Doubling CO2 levels has a direct temperature effect that is on the order of a degree centigrade, but this leads to increased water vapor and more glacier/polar ice retreat, which leads to further warming.  

In an interesting thought experiment, if we removed _all_ the CO2 and CH4 from the atmosphere, we would see a nasty feedback.  That removal would probably lead to enough cooling to see a return to Snowball Earth, with total loss of water vapor and total global coverage by ice.  Temperatures would drop below 255 K (255 K assumes current albedo).  So, in a way, we can attribute &gt;100% of our current 33 degrees C temperature increase above 255 to CO2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mistake #1:  &#8220;most sources place it between 90 and 95%&#8221;:  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/04/water-vapour-feedback-or-forcing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/04/water-vapour-feedback-or-forcing/</a></p>
<p>And other calculations show that water vapor plus clouds is 66% to 85%.  </p>
<p>Mistake #2:  Assuming that there isn&#8217;t a feedback between GHG forcing and water vapor levels.  Doubling CO2 levels has a direct temperature effect that is on the order of a degree centigrade, but this leads to increased water vapor and more glacier/polar ice retreat, which leads to further warming.  </p>
<p>In an interesting thought experiment, if we removed _all_ the CO2 and CH4 from the atmosphere, we would see a nasty feedback.  That removal would probably lead to enough cooling to see a return to Snowball Earth, with total loss of water vapor and total global coverage by ice.  Temperatures would drop below 255 K (255 K assumes current albedo).  So, in a way, we can attribute &gt;100% of our current 33 degrees C temperature increase above 255 to CO2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soshaughnessey</title>
		<link>http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>soshaughnessey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 01:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 15:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalwarming-factorfiction.com/2007/05/05/cold-facts-on-global-warming/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Hey there! I&#039;ve nominated you for the Thinking Blogger Award. Don&#039;t know if it&#039;s as important as it tries to sound... But what the hey, your blog is the only one that makes me stop to consider the pro-anthropogenic and pro-global warming and pro-precuationary principle side of things.

http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/05/06/thinking-blogger-award/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there! I&#8217;ve nominated you for the Thinking Blogger Award. Don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s as important as it tries to sound&#8230; But what the hey, your blog is the only one that makes me stop to consider the pro-anthropogenic and pro-global warming and pro-precuationary principle side of things.</p>
<p><a href="http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/05/06/thinking-blogger-award/" rel="nofollow">http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/05/06/thinking-blogger-award/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

