Dedicated to the balanced discussion of global warming
carbon offset / trading greenhouse kyoto climate model Inconvenient Truth bio fuel ipcc Glacier

INHOFE OPENING STATEMENT: Hearing on Vice President Al Gores Perspective on Global Warming

US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works – March 21, 2007

Senator Inhofe (R. Okla) is a member of this committee and he had remarks prior to the testimony of Mr. Al Gore, former Vice President of the United States.  Senator Inhofe does not appear to believe that world is warming appreciably and, if it is, does not feel that humans are the root cause or at least does not appear to believe that humans should dramatically change behavior to alleviate the condition.

It is my perspective that your global warming alarmist pronouncements are now and have always been filled with inaccuracies and misleading statements. Many of the peer-reviewed studies published in such journals as Nature, Geophysical Research Letters, and Science are radically at odds with your claims.

First, you have claimed that there is a strong, new emerging consensus linking global warming to an increase in hurricane intensity and duration. Yet last year, the World Meteorological Organization very clearly rejected this assertion, and other scientists agree.

Secondly, you said that East Antarctica might melt and this could raise sea levels by 20 feet, so were all going to die. However, according to many scientists, Antarctica is gaining ice mass, not losing it. In a 2005 study published in Science a team of researchers led by Dr. Curt Davis found an overall gain in ice mass in Antarctica over a ten year period.

…the New York Times last week published an article about scientists, many of them your supporters, who say you have overstated your case on global warming in fact, they warn that you may be hurting the so-called cause with your “alarmism.”

When the debate is balanced, skeptics win, alarmists lose. In New York last week, for instance, a major debate took place to examine whether global warming is a crisis. Prior to the debate, the hand-wringers, the alarmists, in the audience outnumbered those who didnt think it was a crisis 2 to 1. After the debate, the alarmists were outnumbered a major turnaround in beliefs in a single night.

Claude Allegre, a French geophysicist Nir Shaviv, an Israeli astrophysicist and meteorologist Reid Bryson have converted from alarmists to believing that climate variability is largely natural. In short, the ranks of converted scientists are skyrocketing.

Lastly, the cost: Global warming is now big business. Thousands of individuals and even some Fortune 100 companies stand to make tens of billions of dollars.

…but the cost of Kyoto and other CO2 reduction schemes are estimated to be over $300 billion

Largest tax increase in history 10 times Clinton-Gore of 93 and the poor pay for it and the science isnt there.  We just cant do that to America, Mr. Vice President and were not gonna.

You can read Senator Inhofe’s statement here.

Technorati Tags:

Similar articles that you may enjoy:

Comments are closed.